Want to learn more about figure skating history? You are in the right place!

Created in 2013, Skate Guard Blog explores the overlooked, forgotten, and underappreciated corners of figure skating history - from little-known stories to fresh perspectives on famous skaters, eras, and events. There’s always something new to discover, so grab a cup of coffee and glide into the rich, fascinating history of the world’s most beloved winter sport.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query figures. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query figures. Sort by date Show all posts

How Do You Figure It?


Long before quadruple Lutzes, levels on spins and "choreographic sequences", compulsory figures were the name of the game in figure skating. For decades, skaters traced precise patterns on the ice, their edge quality and control scrutinized as carefully as any free skate today. By 1980, however, the place of compulsory figures was increasingly under debate, as television, audiences, and even some within the sport questioned their future. 

"How Do You Figure It?", originally published in the June/July 1980 issue of "Canadian Skater" magazine, captures the sentiments of people in the skating world in a time of uncertainty - ten years before compulsory figures were ultimately eliminated. As you will read in the statements below, the skating world valued a discipline that had shaped generations of champions.

"HOW DO YOU FIGURE IT?" 

Table of figures from the 1980 CFSA Rulebook

After the [1980] World Championships in Dortmund, West Germany, ISU President Jacques Favart spoke out in favour of eliminating school figures from major International Championships. "Canadian Skater" posed the following question to a number of well-known skating enthusiasts.

M. Favart has been quoted as saying, "The compulsory figures must die. They are a waste of time and prevent skaters from being more creative."

Do you agree with him?


GARY BEACOM (MEN'S BRONZE MEDALLIST)

I am rigidly opposed to M. Favart's proposal to eliminate figures from world competitions. It is not only because of the direct contribution school figure proficiency plays in the development of a well-rounded free skater and disciplined individual. Equally important is the maintenance of the elite element in our sport which involves the combination of intellectual and physical demands.

My reference to the benefits of figures to free skating is appreciably slanted towards the creative and artistic merit derived from a well-established conceptual understanding of and precision-trained adeptness at, the compulsory school figures. Without hand waving dismissal of this point and wishing to avoid unduly complicated analysis, I suggest that a creative and expressive skater is one who, in the development of a repertoire, spontaneously combines previously acquired coordination with an inventive and commanding portrayal. A good repertoire can only be accomplished in that order - technique first, then artistry. Acutely balanced manoeuvrability is vital if a skater wishes to develop the confidence necessary to perform an uninhibited and effortless free skating program.

I disagree with anyone who argues that such a facility is not increased by the accuracy-oriented activity of school figures. This discipline instills in a skater a profound awareness of the proper carriage and the constant balance compensations required for the variety of one-footed movements fundamental to both figures and free skating. Although the mastery of total body control and versatility is more explicitly compulsory for success in school figures, I believe that nothing less than a comparable degree of excellent and accuracy is needed for a truly distinguished free skating performance, and I will always maintain that a well-versed figure technician will almost invariably be a sure-footed free skater able to direct his or her full effort to creative ends.

For an athlete, amateur sport of any kind can be  a total commitment, a challenge. Each sport requires a few or several types of specialized physical and mental abilities. Figure skating is unique in its balanced demand of all these skills. The elimination of compulsory figures would make it less fulfilling and much less instructive and would not we, in fact, have to rename our sport?


DON JACKSON (WORLD CHAMPION 1962; OLYMPIC BRONZE MEDALLIST 1960)

Figures! Should they be done away with in world competitions? My answer is a decided No!

Once they are taken [out] of the World's, it would only be a question of time before school figures would be dropped from all competitions, National, Sectional, etc. and the deterioration in free skating would begin to set in.

The disciplined application of school figures makes for a better free skater. It may be argued that certain skaters with an aptitude for laying down good school figures on the ice, are, nevertheless, not up to par with other competitors in their free skating. That may be so, but even they would admit to being better free skaters than they would have been without the disciplined practice of figures. Most world champions have either been on top in figures or very close to the top. Those well back in figures were usually well back in free skating as well.

Rather than scrapping figures in competitions, it would be more to the point to upgrade them. Starting at the lowest test level, the skater should be made aware of the importance of doing the figures with form and flow. The tracing should be considered secondary in importance. There should be two sets of marks given on the judge's sheet - one for form and flow and the other for the tracing. The coaches will then be in a better position to teach and impress on the skater the importance of developing the art of stylized motion in figures. In due course the skater will realize that with this form of practice even the tracings will improve without having to resort to steering. Most important, the maximum benefits to free skating from this form of figure practice will be achieved.

I cannot over-emphasize the effects the elimination of figures would eventually have on free skating skills of competitors. Although they only comprise a mere handful of skaters, as compared to the tens of thousands of serious skaters in the many clubs throughout Canada, the are the backbone of the wonderful activity called 'Figure Skating'. If the figures were dropped from competitions, their value would start to diminish throughout the ranks.

The passing of a first test, a fifth test, or the attainment of the gold medal is indeed something for the non-competitive skater to take great pride in. It goes without saying, that if figures are taken out of competitions their value will diminish in the eyes of most skaters, and the feeling will be, if they don't consider figures important in competitions - then why bother?

KAREN MAGNUSSEN-CELLA (WORLD CHAMPION 1973; OLYMPIC SILVER MEDALLIST 1972)

To discontinue compulsory school figures would be to take away a very important part of figure skating. Even though figures may not be as spectacular as the free skating portion of the sport and many people may not understand them, they are without a doubt the backbone of figure skating.

What I mean by 'backbone of figure skating' is that figures represent the point where a young skater learns a sense of body balance on the inside and outside edges and the location of the body in relation to the ice. A skater learns correct posture while practicing figures and that must be the most important element of good figure skating. Concentration is also a key factor in skating because skating itself, be it school figures or free skating, is very technical. Skaters learn to concentrate while learning school figures and this skill can be carried over to the free skating program.

Discipline is something else that can be learned through the compulsory figures. To build a career in skating requires hours of hard work. In there is no discipline many skaters will not go on as they should. I have witnessed so many cases of skaters with a wealth of natural talent who have gone nowhere because of lack discipline that it could make you cry. That is not to say that free style skating is not important also. But all the basic control a skater will need for free skating is learned in figures. The same edge principles apply for jumping and ice dancing. Just as all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy, so all figures and no free skating will, make for a dull skater. A balance of the two is required.

The school figures are the ultimate test of a skater's control. There is still room to show creativity in the free skating segment. As a past skater and world champion and now as a teacher, I feel very strongly that we have champions who are GREAT in all aspects of figure skating.

HELLMUT MAY (FORMER OLYMPIC COMPETITOR FOR AUSTRIAN TEAM AND FSCC PRESIDENT; COACH; DOCTOR OF ECONOMICS)

The two major changes of the last fifteen years intended to update figure skating were the introduction of the compulsory free skating program and the drastic reduction from 60% to 30% in the compulsory of this reduction, figures have not lost their importance. A skater with good figures still holds a considerable edge as, particularly in international competition, judges put more emphasis on the figure portion by allowing larger spreads in the marks given to figures. In reality, the figure portion carries a much greater weight than the 30% it appears to be allotted. The dominance figures still hold in competition is proof that they are an important and integral part of skating and should not be eliminated.

Why are figures so important? They are the essential basis of all skating skills. They teach the skater the kind of discipline necessary to be successful in the sport. Figures are undoubtedly the purest part of figure skating. Here we see the achievement of motor skills not influenced by any other elements. Free skating and dancing are often called the 'art sports' as many other elements besides skating (music, dance, etc.) are used and combined with the skating. This combination makes skating beautiful.

However, they also add to its controversy and difficulty in evaluation. The International Olympic Committee is frowning upon sports which are no truly measurable. Figures have set standards which lend themselves to more precise evaluation than free skating. If figures are dropped, the ISU is playing into the hands of professionalism and show business. It is conceivable that a group of acrobatic performers with sufficient audience and television appeal could abandon the ISU rules and create its own championship. Without figures the doors would be wide open and the ISU would be leaving itself vulnerable to outside competition.

Because figures occupy such a large portion of ice time, lesson time and school schedules, their elimination would endanger the very structure of our coaching system, including the operation of facilities and the teaching faculty.

The position of the ISU regarding figures was first revealed at the ISU/IPSU (International Professional Skating Union) Liason meeting during 1978 Worlds. In the IPSU meeting the following day, the subject was discussed emphatically and a unanimous vote of one hundred international coaches strongly rallied against the elimination of compulsory figures at world competitions. The united statement of coaches from around the world should bear sufficient weight to ensure that FIGURE SKATING REMAINS FIGURE SKATING.


BRIAN POCKAR (THREE TIME CANADIAN CHAMPION, RANKED 9TH IN THE WORLD)

I strongly disagree with M. Favart's statement. The best comparison I can think of is a pianist. Scales are the basic technique that must be mastered before any pianist can hope to become proficient. School figures, like scales, are where it all starts. They teach the basics of skating and give the skater a feel for the sport - the inside edges and turns. As well, they teach the body control and discipline so crucial to mastering the sport.

There were many criticisms of the judging of figures at Olympics and World's this year. In my opinion, judging is improving every year. Of course, some mistakes are made. This is to be expected, and there injustices in the judging of figures as there are in any competition. If there is a 'problem' with the judging of figures, it is surely with the system - not with the figures themselves. A solution to this 'problem' should come through a thorough examination of the system of judging figures, not through their elimination.

Without figures, a skater will never really learn to skate, and that, after all, is the point of the exercise.

BARBARA ANN SCOTT KING (WORLD CHAMPION 1947, 1948; OLYMPIC GOLD MEDALLIST 1948 - WINNER OF BOTH FIGURES AND FREE SKATING)

The very name of the sport is FIGURE SKATING - not free skating; not exhibition skating. It is a competitive sport. The basic foundation of figure skating is a strong grounding in school figures. Ballet has barre work... pianists have finger exercises... figure skating has school figures.

My feeling is that youngsters today are not willing to spend the hours necessary to perfect school figures. The years of practice spent of figures teaches a young person the discipline that is so sadly lacking these days. It not only gives one a solid grounding for good free skating, but also helps one to learn concentration and the ability to work hard at something that is not always fun but demands the sacrifice of practice and patience. This discipline carries over into everyday life and teaches the importance of work before play.

Unfortunately, TV does not show this important part of skating competitions because figures are not of interest to the general public. But this notwithstanding, the important question is - Are figure skating competitions commercial ventures, entertainment or serious forums for top athletes to compete against each other? There are other opportunities for purely creative endeavours. A real skating competition is not an ice show, exhibition or television special. It should be an entirely separate activity.

As one who truly loves the sport of figure skating, I hope and pray that the tradition will never be compromised or abolished.

LILIANE DE KRESZ (COACH; FORMER HEAD COACH OF NATIONAL SEMINAR)

While the figures are by no means the end to it all, and often make the end result hard to justify for a TV audience at large, it can't be denied that they do have a vital role in the development of a fine skater.

Figures mean discipline, balance, coordination, edges, flow, just to name a few components. But above all, what they mean to the skater is a strive for excellence.

The elimination of figures from high level competition could bring about the decline of the sport as we know it. Because if no longer required at the top, skaters would take a more casual attitude towards figure practice and would not be willing to spend the time practicing skills to perfection for which there is no direct reward.

OTTO HUGIN (COACH)

Even if compulsory figures were eliminated at the international level, they would still be required at national competitions. Therefore, skaters would continue to spend time learning and practicing their school figures in order to succeed within their own countries. These hours and years of wasted time would negatively affect their progress at school and their education. Since the ISU itself does not consider a total elimination of the compulsory figures it has become necessary to search for a fair compromise that has national and international validity. The time spent in exercising the compulsory figures (70% of the total  training time) has to be more reasonably adjusted in relation to the final rating where they count for 30% of the total points in a competition. Moreover, the draw for the starting order in the short program should be made independent of the result of the compulsory competition. Until now the rule has been that mediocre compulsory skaters have been relegated to a poor group draw for the short program; the effect of this is felt up to the final rating since the usual group evaluation system only fails to do justice to the actual performance in the short program and in free skating.

A proposed solution of the problem:

a) Compulsory figures

The compulsory figures can be reduced from 41 to 23 figures without deleting a single element. The ISU and National Figure Tests would be as follows:

4th test No. 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 (5 figures)
3rd test No. 4, 6, 8, 14, 15 (5 figures)
2nd test No. 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23 (6 figures)
1st test No. 20, 21, 31, 38, 39, 40, 41 (7 figures)

b) Draw for the starting order in the short program

The right to a draw in groups 3 and 4 is based on the ranking in the 1st-12th evaluation rank in the short program/free skating program at the European or World's competition of the previous year.

Example World Competition in 1981

Group 4
Linda Fratianne, Emi Watanabi, Denise Biellmann, Anett Pötzsch , Dagmar Lurz, Elaine Zayak

Group 3
Katarina Witt, Lisa-Marie Allen, Claudia Kristofics-Binder, Deborah Cottrill, Sanda Dubravčić, Carola Weissenberg

Kristina Wegelius and Tracey Wainman would move up to take the place of the retiring Linda Fratianne and Dagmar Lurz.

c) Draw for the group of compulsory figures

The draw for the figure group to be skated would take place at the ISU Conference in June (similar to the short program). On the evening prior to the competition, the only draw to be made would be for the foot on which to skate.

This would greatly reduce the practice time and it would probably much improve the quality of the figures.

Skate Guard is a blog dedicated to preserving the rich, colourful and fascinating history of figure skating. Over ten years, the blog has featured over a thousand free articles covering all aspects of the sport's history, as well as four compelling in-depth features. To read the latest articles, follow the blog on FacebookBlueskyPinterest and YouTube. If you enjoy Skate Guard, please show your support for this archive by ordering one of eight fascinating books highlighting the history of figure skating: https://skateguard1.blogspot.com/p/buy-book.html  

The Art Of Special Figures


"For quite a long period... this branch of skating was placed in the forefront of skating artistry, and halted the development of pure skating. More than anything else it was a skater's ability to cut upon the ice the most original creation in artistic design and to execute it with ease and elegance that stamped him as a champion. But the craze for a designing was a temporary diversion from the true course of development in skating. It did however show how much could be done upon a skate." - Nigel Brown, "Ice-Skating: A History", 1959

Figure skating was first contested at the Olympic Games in London, England in 1908. Sweden's Ulrich Salchow and Great Britain's Madge Syers were the victors in the men's and women's events and Germany's Anna Hübler and Heinrich Burger won the gold medal in the pairs competition. Russia's Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin had the distinction of winning a gold medal in a fourth category, at the time termed Gentlemen's Special Figure Skating. The 1908 Games marked the only time that Special Figures were contested at the Olympic Games, but the rise in popularity and demise of this specialized branch of skating was far from straight-forward. 


Skaters have had a fascination with carving out discernable patterns on the ice for centuries. In 1772, in the oldest surviving book on figure skating, Captain Robert Jones described how "to cut the figure of a heart on one leg". Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century in North America, the best 'fancy' skaters of the day were celebrated not for their jumping and spinning prowess, nor their skill at basic figures, but their ability to use their blades as quills. 


In 1882, the Internationalen Preis-Figurenlaufen (Great International Skating Tournament) was held in Vienna, Austria. Skaters were required to demonstrate their proficiency at a long list of school figures, as well as exhibit a specialty or 'special figure' of their own choosing. It was in this 'special figure' category that Axel Paulsen demonstrated his namesake jump. Another skater, Theodore Langer, chose to perform an intricate star figure. By the time the Neva Skating Association in St. Petersburg hosted another major international competition in 1890, there were three distinctly defined, separate categories: compulsory figures, special figures (patterns) and 'fantasifigurer' (free skating). The winner of the special figure competition, Russia's Alexei Pavlovich Lebedeff, tied for first place in the free skating category and included several of his special figure designs in his winning performance. 


Georg Sanders, in Irving Brokaw's book "The Art Of Skating", posited, "The origin of the name 'Special Figures' is pretty obvious. It first came into vogue when, many years ago, an opportunity was given to figure skaters to exhibit whatever special degree of proficiency they might have attained in movements or drawings on the ice. Thus some were past masters in jumping, executing pirouettes, spread-eagles, grapevines, and pivot figures... Then deftness in cutting various patterns on the ice surface furnished the basis of another important class of special figures... A more correct designation would, perhaps, be Figure Combinations or Figure Designs... Special figures ought, as far as possible, to be original, the creations of the artistic faculty of each individual, and a proof of his ability to adapt, combine and harmonize. The elements of school figures and various supplementary figures supply the materials on which his ingenuity goes to work, out of which he produces fresh designs."


Special Figures were often skated on one foot, through a combination of rockers, loops, counters, brackets and threes connected by edges and crosscuts. They also often included a type of figure at the time referred to as Beaks, which were variations on rockers and counters where, instead of the curves being carried forward, they were brought sharply back by swinging the free foot forward at the same time the skating foot moved in front. 


Special Figures emphasized pattern over form, and due to their small size often entailed rather jarring, lurching movements of both the free foot and arms, which made them inherently unattractive to English Style skaters. Montagu Sneade Monier-Williams' 1892 book "Figure-Skating Simple And Combined" bemoaned, "Small figures which are performed on one foot, and which, owing to the energetic action of the unemployed leg, and strange contortions of the body they seem to necessitate, have earned for themselves the generic name of 'Kickers.'... These interesting little figures are of a too stationary nature to work well in 'combined skating'... These figures so often proved themselves to be absolutely destructive to the good form of those who practise them."

However, the very best exponents of Special Figures were able to accomplish both form and finesse. In their book "The Art Of Skating: International Style", Madge and Edgar Syers recalled, "Most of them are difficult to skate in good form, owing to the incessant and rapid action of the free foot, which is apt to give the appearance of a series of kicks. These figures should be skated slowly and the effort should be concealed as much as possible... Panin, who has made this branch of skating his [specialty], was mathematically precise in his tracings, and his positions and movements were never in the least awkward or jerky; with body and head erect he found it only necessary to glance occasionally at the maze of curves and turns which his skate described with such consummate ease."


Special Figures were a specialized niche, practiced mainly by only the best skaters in the world... because they were hard to do. They were particularly popular in Russia and Finland, which was then a Royal Duchy of the Russian Empire. Georg Sanders, Alexei Pavlovich Lebedeff, Karl Antonovich Ollo and John Catani were all masters of the art. 


The earliest winners at ISU Championships - skaters like Gustav Hügel, Gilbert Fuchs and Ulrich Salchow - all excelled at Special Figures, in addition to school figures and free skating. The top skaters of the day in the Victorian and Edwardian eras often plagiarized each others' designs, no doubt leading to many skirmishes that were never recorded. Ulrich Salchow's famous row with Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin at the 1908 Olympic Games was likely exacerbated by the fact that Panin-Kolomenkin handed him a rare defeat at an international Special Figures competition in St. Petersburg earlier that year.


A skater's skill talent at Special Figures was a boost to their reputation, and indeed an integral part of their success at free skating. A well-balanced free skating program for much of the early twentieth century included not only dance steps, small jumps and spins, pivots, spirals and spread eagles, but both school and special figures.

Arthur Cumming, the 1908 Olympic Silver Medallist in Special Figures (top) and Special Figures of Cumming's design (bottom)

As was the case at the 1908 Olympics, skaters competing in Special Figures competitions in Russia, Russian Finland, Sweden, Austria and Germany at the turn of the century were required to submit  diagrams of their figures in a sealed envelope, as well as provide descriptions, to the judges days before any competition. This format took Planned Program Content to the extreme... nearly a century before the IJS System was even conceived.

Not every attempt to translate art to ice was a success story. In an article in "The Field" in 1909, Geoffrey Hall-Say, who won the bronze medal in Special Figures at the 1908 Games, remarked that some unsuccessful attempts of translating designs to the ice resulted in "something like that which would be produced by a child scrawling in a large unformed hand with a diamond on a sheet of plate glass." Hall-Say also jokingly suggested that "Fig. 40 - the portrait of a skating judge - may be recommended to an unsuccessful competitor." Hall-Say and Arthur Cumming's participation in the Special Figures event in 1908 was particularly interesting, as Great Britain's National Skating Association had abandoned their test for Special Figures seven years prior to the Games.

A Portrait Of A Skating Judge figure, described by Geoffrey Hall-Say

Numerous factors contributed to Special Figures falling out of vogue. The ISU's 1897 adoption of a schedule of school figures, as well as their exclusion of Special Figures at ISU Championships after 1896, was one factor. The rise in popularity of the Continental Style, with its focus on free movement and form, was another. Of Special Figures in 1913, Hugo Winzer wrote, "These tricky things demand continual training - and spoil the fine, artistic skating."

It's also key to recognize the fact that as this branch of skating was such a specialized, niche pursuit, the premature deaths of several of its top exponents no doubt hastened its popularity. Alexander Nikitich Panschin committed suicide in 1904; Karl Antonovich Ollo and Ivan Pavlovich Malinin died on the front lines during The Great War

Gillis Grafström

By the roaring twenties, exceedingly few skaters devoted any effort whatsoever to Special Figures. Madge and Edgar Syers suggested that weather played a rule in their exclusion from free skating programs. Many ISU Championships were held outdoors under unpredictable and, at times, grueling conditions. In their "Book Of Winter Sports", the Syers' wrote, "The uncertainty of reproducing in competitions figures which a slight inequality in the ice or a gust of wind may mar, has led to their being generally omitted from free skating."

Gillis Grafström's Change-Of-Edge star figure

Though he was in the minority, Olympic Gold Medallist Gillis Grafström, demonstrated an unusual interest and ability in this area. Though Grafström never competed in a Special Figures competition, he was responsible for the creation of dozens of new patterns. In 1943, future ISU Historian Benjamin T. Wright recalled, "He invented more than fifty... In England in 1937 the National Skating Association instituted a Platinum Test, even higher than the Gold, which included some of [his] special figures, such as rocker eights, counter eights, three-loop-three, bracket-rocker-bracket and various others. This test was taken and passed at Bournemouth by Graham Sharp, the present World Champion." North American skaters Tim Brown and Gary Beacom devoted time and effort to mastering Special Figures in the decades that followed.

Quilt created by Marion Wolfe of Wisconsin, displayed at the 1993 U.S. Championships. Photo courtesy "Skating" magazine.

Many know that dramatic video of the last figures being skated at the World Championships in Nova Scotia in 1990 and the gradual demise of the compulsory figures in international competition, but few mourn the loss of Special Figures. Perhaps that's because beautiful pictures are still being painted on the ice today... just in a different way.

SPECIAL FIGURES COMPETITIONS OF NOTE

This data has been compiled from various German, Austrian, Russian, Swedish and Finnish newspaper archives, as well as Gilbert Fuchs' book “Theories und Praxis des Kunstlaufs am Eise” and Georg Sanders' chapter on Special Figures in the first edition of Irving Brokaw's book “The Art Of Skating”.

Year and Location

Event

Winner

2nd

3rd

1879 (St. Petersburg)

Yusupov Gardens Specialfiguren-Wettbewerb

Alexei Pavlovich Lebedeff

(not recorded)

(not recorded)

1882 (Vienna)

Internationalen Preis-Figurenlaufen (Great International Skating Tournament)*

Leopold Frey

Eduard Engelmann Jr.

Axel Paulsen

1883 (Helsinki)

Skridskotäflan i Helsingfors

Alexei Pavlovich Lebedeff

John Catani

Rudolf Sundgrén

1887 (Munich)

Preis-Figurenlaufen

Robert Büchtger

Victor Seybert

Franz Rosenstengel

1888 (Stockholm)

Skridskotäflingarna i Stockholm

Rudolf Sundgrén

Ivar Hult

Alfred Franklin

1889 (Helsinki)

Skridskotäflingarna i Stockholm - Den Internationella Amatörstäflingen - Men

Rudolf Sundgrén

Ivar Hult

John Catani

1889 (Helsinki)

Skridskotäflingarna i Stockholm - Den Internationella Amatörstäflinge – Women

Nadja Franck

Anna Weibull

Magda Mauroy

1889 (St. Petersburg)

Wettlaufen St. Petersburg – Simesnovski-Eisbahn

Georg Sanders

N. Semenoff

(not recorded)

1890 (St. Petersburg)

Internationale Kunstlaufen**

Alexei Pavlovich Lebedeff

Louis Rubenstein/John Catani (tie)

Carl Kaiser

1891 (St. Petersburg)

Kunstlaufen, Simesnovski-Eisbahn

Georg Sanders

(not recorded)

(not recorded)

1891 (St. Petersburg)

Kunstlaufen, Stern-Eisbahn

Georg Sanders

Herr Simnitzki

(not recorded)

1892 (St. Petersburg)

Spezialfiguren-Wettlaufen (St. Petersburg Society Of Ice Skating Amateurs)

Georg Sanders

(not recorded)

(not recorded)

1896 (St. Petersburg)

World Championships – Special Figures

Georg Sanders

Gilbert Fuchs

Gustav Hügel

1897 (St. Petersburg)

Spezialfiguren-Wettlaufen (St. Petersburg Society Of Ice Skating Amateurs)

Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin

Herr Morozoff

Herr Rimer

1903 (Munich)

Specialfiguren-Wettlaufen des Münchener Eislaufvereines

Gilbert Fuchs

Ludwig Niedermeyer

(not recorded)

1906 (St. Petersburg)

Specialfiguren-Wettbewerb um den Alexander Panschin-Preis

Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin

Ulrich Salchow

Karl Ollo

1907 (Davos)

Spezialfigurenlaufen (held in conjunction with European Speed Skating Championships)

Phyllis (Squire) Johnson

Edgar Syers/Dr. Halden (tie)

H. Charles Holt

1907 (St. Petersburg)

Specialfiguren-Wettbewerb um den Alexander Panschin-Preis

Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin

Fedor Datlin

(not recorded)

1908 (St. Petersburg)

World Championships - Specialfiguren-Wettbewerb um den Alexander Panschin-Preis***

Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin

Ulrich Salchow

Karl Ollo

1908 (London)

Olympic Games – Special Figures

Nikolay Panin-Kolomenkin

Arthur Cumming

Geoffrey Hall-Say

1909 (Paris)

Specialfiguren-Wettlaufen Club des Patineurs

Louis Magnus

Lucien Trugard

Maurice del Valle

1909 (St. Petersburg)

Jubileumstäfling

Karl Ollo

H.O. Wächter

Oskar Hoppe

1909 (Vyborg)

Internationell konståkning om N. D. Bojarinoff's vandringssköld****

Karl Ollo

Aleksander Huuri

T. Landelius

1910 (Vyborg)

Internationell konståkning om N. D. Bojarinoff's vandringssköld****

Karl Ollo

Aleksander Huuri

Sakari Ilmanen

1912 (Vyborg)

Internationell konståkning om N. D. Bojarinoff's vandringssköld****

Karl Ollo

Herr Langenheim

(no other competitors)

1913 (Vyborg)

Internationell konståkning om N. D. Bojarinoff's vandringssköld****

Herr Langenheim

Sergei van der Vliet

(no other competitors)

*The 1882 competition in Vienna consisted of both Compulsory and Special Figures. Leopold Frey was the overall winner, but Axel Paulsen's Special Figure, which was actually his namesake jump, earned top marks in that phase of the event. Eduard Engelmann Jr. won the compulsory figures, but Frey was judged the overall winner.

**Though held before the formation of the ISU, the 1890 competition in St. Petersburg was billed by its organizers as a World Championship for amateurs. Skaters from Austria, Canada, Russia and Scandinavia participated. There were three separate categories: Compulsory Figures, Special Figures and 'Fantasifiguren' (Free Skating). Canada's Louis Rubenstein won the Compulsory Figures and Russia's Alexei Pavlovich Lebedeff the Special Figures. Lebedeff and Finland's John Catani tied in the Free Skating class, in which Rubenstein did not participate.

***The competition for the Alexander Panschin-Preis, held in conjunction with the 1908 World Championships for pairs in St. Petersburg, included Special Figures as part of the programme.

****Archives of the “Finskt idrottsblad” note that the annual competition for the N.D. Bojarinoff Shield consisted of three Special Figures and a five minute free skating competition. Compulsory figures were not included.


Skate Guard is a blog dedicated to preserving the rich, colourful and fascinating history of figure skating. Over ten years, the blog has featured over a thousand free articles covering all aspects of the sport's history, as well as four compelling in-depth features. To read the latest articles, follow the blog on FacebookTwitterPinterest and YouTube. If you enjoy Skate Guard, please show your support for this archive by ordering a copy of figure skating reference books "The Almanac of Canadian Figure Skating", "Technical Merit: A History of Figure Skating Jumps" and "A Bibliography of Figure Skating": https://skateguard1.blogspot.com/p/buy-book.html

The 6.0 System: Value Of Each Section of Competitions

Compulsory dances and school figures may be a thing of the past in ISU Championships, but in skating's glory days, they played a crucial role in deciding who came out on top. 

Compiled from old rulebooks, magazines and judging manuals, the below data highlights how the scoring system evolved and changed over the course of over a century, under the 6.0 system.

SINGLES FIGURE SKATING

Abbreviations used: CF (Compulsory Figures), FS (Free Skating), OP (Original Program), SP (Short Program), TP (Technical Program), QR (Qualifying Round)


Year

QR

CF

SP/TP/OP

FS

Number of Figures

Notes

1896

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1897

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1898

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1899

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1900

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1901

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1902

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1903

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1904

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1905

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1906

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1907

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1908

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1909

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1910

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1911

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1912

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1913

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

At 1913 ISU Congress, Norwegian Federation motioned that figures & free skating should be worth the same. Voted down 10-2.

1914

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1922

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1923

N/A

61.11%

N/A

38.89%

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

Based on a maximum rating of 432 points – 264 for school figures and 168 for free skating, by a factor of 14

1924

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1925

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1926

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1927

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1928

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1929

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1930

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1931

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1932

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1933

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1934

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1935

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1936

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1937

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1938

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1939

N/A

60-67%*

N/A

33-40%*

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)

See note below table

1947


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

12 (6 figures skated on each foot)


1948


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1949


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1950


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1951


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1952


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1953


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6

Proposal to make figures & free skating both worth 50% shot down at ISU Congress

1954


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1955


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1956


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1957


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1958


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1959


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1960


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1961


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1962


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1963


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1964


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1965


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6

Proposal to make figures and free skating equal in value got a vote in favour at ISU Congress, but didn't meet 2/3 majority so didn't pass

1966


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1967


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1968


60.00%

N/A

40.00%

6


1969


50.00%

N/A

50.00%

6

First year figures and free skating were equal in value at World Championships

1970


50.00%

N/A

50.00%

6


1971


50.00%

N/A

50.00%

6


1972


50.00%

N/A

50.00%

6


1973


40.00%

20.00%

40.00%

3

After first season SP was included in singles events, “various proposals to increase to four the number of compulsory figures skated in ISU Championships were defeated” at ISU Congress.

1974


40.00%

20.00%

40.00%

3


1975


40.00%

20.00%

40.00%

3


1976


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1977


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1978


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1979


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1980


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1981


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1982


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1983


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1984


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1985


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1986


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1987


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1988


30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1989


20.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2

First year of original program with one set of requirements, previously short program elements had been drawn from 4 different groups

1990


20.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1991


N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1992


N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1993

Did not count (qualifying purposes only)

N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1994

Did not count (qualifying purposes only)

N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1995

Did not count (qualifying purposes only)

N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1996

Did not count (qualifying purposes only)

N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1997

Did not count (qualifying purposes only)

N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1998

Did not count (qualifying purposes only)

N/A

33.30%

66.70%

0


1999

20.00%

N/A

30.00%

50.00%

0


2000

20.00%

N/A

30.00%

50.00%

0


2001

20.00%

N/A

30.00%

50.00%

0


2002

20.00%

N/A

30.00%

50.00%

0


2003

20.00%

N/A

30.00%

50.00%

0


2004

20.00%

N/A

30.00%

50.00%

0


*Modern histories of the sport note that compulsory figures were worth 60% and free skating was worth 40% during this period. In reality, this was not a uniform standard until after World War II. At the 1897 World Championships, figures were worth 67% and free skating 33%. The figure skating events at the 1908 Summer Olympics were based on a maximum rating of 276 points – 168 for school figures and 108 for free skating, by a factor of 9, with figures worth 60.87% and free skating 39.13%. At the 1923 World Championships, scoring was based on a maximum rating of 432 points – 264 for school figures and 168 for free skating, by a factor of 14. Figures were worth 61.11% and free skating 38.89%. These inconsistencies can be attributed to the fact that the national skating associations that hosted the ISU Championships played a major role in organizing judging and scorecards in skating's early days.

PAIRS SKATING

Abbreviations used: CCP (Compulsory Connected Program), FS (Free Skating), OP (Original Program), SP (Short Program), TP (Technical Program)


Year

CCP/SP/OP/

TP

FS

Notes

1901

N

100.00%

First year pairs competitions were included at World Championships, though it was not considered an official competition for a World title. There were 2 pairs events – 1 for a man and a woman and 1 for 2 men

1902

N

100.00%


1903

N

100.00%


1904

N

100.00%


1905

N

100.00%


1906

N

100.00%


1907

N

100.00%


1908

N

100.00%

First officially recognized World Championships for pairs, though pairs competitions were held at Worlds every year from 1901-1907

1909

N

100.00%


1910

N

100.00%


1911

N

100.00%


1912

N

100.00%


1913

N

100.00%


1914

N

100.00%


1922

N

100.00%


1923

N

100.00%


1924

N

100.00%


1925

N

100.00%


1926

N

100.00%


1927

N

100.00%


1928

N

100.00%


1929

N

100.00%


1930

N

100.00%


1931

N

100.00%


1932

N

100.00%


1933

N

100.00%


1934

N

100.00%


1935

N

100.00%


1936

N

100.00%


1937

N

100.00%


1938

N

100.00%


1939

N

100.00%


1947

N

100.00%


1948

N

100.00%


1949

N

100.00%


1950

N

100.00%


1951

N

100.00%


1952

N

100.00%


1953

N

100.00%


1954

N

100.00%


1955

N

100.00%


1956

N

100.00%


1957

N

100.00%


1958

N

100.00%


1959

N

100.00%


1960

N

100.00%


1961

N

100.00%


1962

N

100.00%


1963

N/A

100.00%


1964

33.30%

66.70%

Trial of compulsory connected program

1965

33.30%

66.70%

Trial of compulsory connected program

1966

33.30%

66.70%


1967

33.30%

66.70%


1968

33.30%

66.70%


1969

25.00%

75.00%

25% was a reduction

1970

25.00%

75.00%


1971

25.00%

75.00%


1972

25.00%

75.00%


1973

25.00%

75.00%


1974

25.00%

75.00%


1975

25.00%

75.00%


1976

25.00%

75.00%


1977

25.00%

75.00%


1978

25.00%

75.00%


1979

28.57%

71.43%


1980

28.57%

71.43%


1981

28.57%

71.43%


1982

28.57%

71.43%


1983

28.57%

71.43%


1984

28.57%

71.43%


1985

28.57%

71.43%


1986

28.57%

71.43%


1987

28.57%

71.43%


1988

28.57%

71.43%


1989

28.57%

71.43%


1990

28.57%

71.43%


1991

33.30%

66.70%


1992

33.30%

66.70%


1993

33.30%

66.70%


1994

33.30%

66.70%


1995

33.30%

66.70%


1996

33.30%

66.70%


1997

33.30%

66.70%


1998

33.30%

66.70%


1999

33.30%

66.70%


2000

33.30%

66.70%


2001

33.30%

66.70%


2002

33.30%

66.70%


2003

33.30%

66.70%


2004

33.30%

66.70%


ICE DANCING

Abbreviations used: CD (Compulsory Dances), FD (Free Dance), OD (Original Dance), OSP (Original Set Pattern Dance),


Year

CD

OSP/OD

FD

Number of CDs Skated

Notes

1950

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4

International Ice Dancing Competition held in conjunction with Worlds, consisting of 4 compulsory dances and a 3 min free dance

1951

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1952

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1953

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1954

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1955

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1956

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1957

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1958

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1959

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1960

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1961

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1962

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1963

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1964

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1965

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1966

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1967

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1968

60.00%

N/A

40.00%

4


1969

45.00%

15.00%

40.00%

3

First year OSP skated at Worlds

1970

45.00%

15.00%

40.00%

3


1971

45.00%

15.00%

40.00%

3


1972

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3

OSP was marked as part of compulsories

1973

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1974

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1975

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1976

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1977

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1978

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1979

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1980

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1981

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1982

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1983

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1984

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3

OSP marked as a separate entity from compulsories

1985

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1986

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1987

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1988

30.00%

20.00%

50.00%

3


1989

20.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2

Reduced compulsory dances from 3 to 2, at international competitions (non-ISU Championships) 1 was permitted

1990

20.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1991

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2

Original dance introduced, compulsory dances each judged separately

1992

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1993

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1994

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1995

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1996

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1997

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1998

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


1999

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


2000

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


2001

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


2002

10.00% + 10.00%

30.00%

50.00%

2


2003

20.00%

30.00%

50.00%

1 (per team), 2 groups

Teams divided into 2 groups for compulsory dances

2004

20.00%

30.00%

50.00%

1 (per team), 2 groups


Skate Guard is a blog dedicated to preserving the rich, colourful and fascinating history of figure skating. Over ten years, the blog has featured over a thousand free articles covering all aspects of the sport's history, as well as four compelling in-depth features. To read the latest articles, follow the blog on FacebookBlueskyPinterest and YouTube. If you enjoy Skate Guard, please show your support for this archive by ordering one of six fascinating books highlighting the history of figure skating: https://skateguard1.blogspot.com/p/buy-book.html.